Funding Announcements

Open Funding Opportunity Notices (FONs)

pdf document Read Me First

17-1-01 Landscape fuel treatment strategies and wildfire management More Information Actions
The objective of this task statement is to inform planning and implementation of landscape fuel treatment strategies that allow for safe and effective management of wildfire to meet protection and resource management objectives. Projects funded under this task statement are intended to support the vision of the 2014 National Cohesive Wildfire Management Strategy, in particular progressing towards resilient landscapes. Research Needs: Research proposals are sought that evaluate the effectiveness of landscape fuel treatment strategies with a focus on the interaction between landscape fuel treatment strategies and subsequent wildfire management actions as they relate to the ability to implement safe, effective, and efficient wildfire management decisions. Specific research needs include: 1. Identify the characteristics of landscape fuel treatment strategies (e.g., distribution/saturation of treatments, type, age, location) that allow for effective and safe use by firefighters to manage wildfire for resource management objectives and asset protection. 2. Evaluate how the effectiveness of landscape fuel treatment strategies is constrained by different social (e.g., proximity to human communities, degree to which managers consider resource management objectives), ecological (e.g., vegetation type, fire regime), or other factors. 3. Develop metrics that are scientifically defensible and measureable for evaluating the effectiveness of landscape fuel treatment strategies in terms of allowing for safe and effective use by firefighters to manage wildfire for resource management objectives and asset protection. For proposals to be considered responsive to this task statement, proposals must address the first two research needs above. It is expected that these research needs will be addressed through retrospective analyses, modeling, or other feasible approach. Proposals that address the third research need as well are desirable but not required. Research needs under this task statement do not include an evaluation of the direct effect of landscape fuel treatments on resources.

View complete description >>
View FON

Proposal Body

List of Acronyms

Support Letters

CV

Data Management Plan

Science Delivery

Literature Cited

Budget Narrative

Budget Spreadsheet

Closes on Nov 17, 2016

Apply Now

17-1-02 Effects of changing wildfire management strategies More Information Actions
Objective: The objective of this task statement is to assess the degree to which wildfire management strategies have changed since the issuance of the 2009 Guidance for Implementation of the Federal Fire Policy and the effectiveness of such changes. Research Needs: The Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP) is interested in proposals that using retrospective analyses, perhaps combined with modeling exercises, evaluate changing wildfire management strategies and the effectiveness of these strategies in meeting resource management objectives. Research needs include: 1. Quantify the extent to which wildfire response strategies and tactics have changed since issuance of the 2009 wildfire policy guidance and identify any barriers that have hampered these changes. 2. Describe the degree to which changing wildfire response strategies and tactics have had a beneficial or adverse impact on highly valued resources (e.g., human communities, air quality, wildlife habitat) or changed the risk of future wildfire to such resources. 3. Identify how the range of burning conditions (e.g., weather, fuels) affects the effectiveness of wildfire and wildfire management activities to meet specific objectives for managing fuels and vegetation. Proposers must address all three research needs above. The JFSP is particularly interested in studies that examine how responses to these questions differ by region, agency, vegetation type, or other significant factor. The JFSP expects that information on changing wildfire strategies can be inferred from an analysis of incident reports, interviews with incident commanders, or both.

View complete description >>
View FON

Proposal Body

List of Acronyms

Support Letters

CV

Data Management Plan

Science Delivery

Budget Narrative

Budget Spreadsheet

Literature Cited

Closes on Nov 17, 2016

Apply Now

17-1-03 Post-fire recovery More Information Actions
Objective: The objective of this task statement is to advance our fundamental and applied understanding of post-fire recovery and associated management responses in ecosystems for which altered fire regimes may shape post-fire recovery trajectory(ies); in particular, for those ecosystems that span the range of the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Research Needs: For each ecosystem proposed for study, specific research needs include: 1. Relationships (i.e., interactions with and implications for) between (a) pre-fire (e.g., existing native and non-native invasive vegetation) and immediately post-fire conditions (e.g., burn severity, amount of downed woody materials), (b) standard, immediate post-fire stabilization approaches (e.g., herbicide applications, seeding, erosion control) that respond to those particular conditions, and (c) long-term (i.e., three years and beyond) recovery actions. 2. How the phasing of recovery actions in general (i.e., not just related to immediate stabilization actions) either facilitate or adversely affect long-term recovery in the context of meeting management objectives, including desired ecosystem services. 3. Role of soil ecological processes and community structure and composition in facilitating or preventing invasion by non-native species that alter fire behavior. 4. Relative effectiveness of different soil and vegetation treatments (e.g., for woody plant species this could be different seeding or seedling establishment approaches at different spatial scales) in facilitating recovery. 5. Spatially and temporally explicit, robust (i.e., scientifically defensible), and easily measured metrics of recovery that account for the phases of recovery as well as desired outcomes. For proposals to be considered responsive to this task statement, proposals must address at least both research needs 1 and 2. In addition, proposers have the option to address one or more of research needs 3 through 5. The JFSP is particularly interested in proposals that address ecosystems that span the range of the greater sage-grouse. For each ecosystem proposed for study, proposals also must include a conceptual model of ecosystem function in the context of fire that is used to (1) convey the state of our scientific understanding and management practice, (2) identify key remaining knowledge gaps, and (3) provide a basis for proposed hypotheses, questions, and experimental design. As context for proposed work, proposals should describe the degree to which environmental and other factors (e.g., presence of invasive species that alter fire behavior) have changed from historic conditions that affect fire as an ecological process and how these changes affect post-fire recovery for the ecosystem(s) they propose to study.

View complete description >>
View FON

Proposal Body

Literature Cited

Budget Spreadsheet

Budget Narrative

Science Delivery

Data Management Plan

CV

Support Letters

List of Acronyms

Closes on Nov 17, 2016

Apply Now

17-1-04 Fire effects on herbaceous and shrub species More Information Actions
Objective: The objective of this task statement is to develop empirical and mechanistic data and information on the effects of fire on meristematic tissue and seeds of herbaceous plant and shrub species that may ultimately be used in the development or validation of fire effects models that predict herbaceous plant and shrub response to fire. Research Needs: The Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP) is interested in proposals that through laboratory and field experiments further our understanding of the direct effects of heat from fire on a variety of herbaceous and shrub species under different environmental conditions and across different geographic areas. Research needs include: 1. Quantify the effect of heat from fire on the ability of a variety of herbaceous and shrub species to resprout from meristematic tissue (e.g., buds, meristems) under different environmental conditions. 2. Quantify the effect of heat from fire on germination of seeds from a variety of herbaceous and shrub species under different environmental conditions. 3. Quantify additional germination requirements (e.g., bare mineral soil, soil moisture) of seeds from a variety of herbaceous plant and shrub species following fire. For proposals to be considered responsive to this task statement, proposals must address either research need 1 or 2 listed above. So that resulting data are broadly applicable, JFSP is particularly interested in proposals that address the research needs associated with multiple species. It is JFSPs desire that developed datasets ultimately can be used in development or validation of fire effects prediction models. Proposals that include model development or validation are desirable, but not required.

View complete description >>
View FON

Proposal Body

Literature Cited

Budget Spreadsheet

Budget Narrative

Science Delivery

Data Management Plan

CV

Support Letters

List of Acronyms

Closes on Nov 17, 2016

Apply Now

17-1-05 Validating mesoscale, atmospheric boundary prediction models and tools More Information Actions
Objective: The operational fire weather community requires validation of numerical weather models and predictive tools as a means of raising situational awareness. The Joint Fire Science Program is interested in research proposals that address this need within a risk management context with the goal of enhancing firefighter safety. Research Needs: Research proposals are sought that address the validation requirements of existing numerical weather models and predictive tools with regard to predicting mesoscale atmospheric boundaries. Specific research needs include: 1. Demonstrate the ability to characterize the development, movement, and magnitude of mesoscale atmospheric boundaries through validation of existing numerical weather models and predictive tools using relevant observational data. 2. Demonstrate forecast skill of thunderstorm outflows, gust fronts, and downdraft winds near fires through validation of the above models and tools. 3. Demonstrate that validation of the above models and tools can be accomplished in complex terrain situations. 4. Communicate model and tool outputs (predictions) within a risk management context that is meaningful to the operational fire weather community and firefighters. For proposals to be considered responsive to this task statement, proposals must address all four research needs. Proposals to develop new or enhance existing models are outside the scope of this topic; however, improvements in model structure that occur incidental to model validation are acceptable.

View complete description >>
View FON

Proposal Body

Literature Cited

Budget Spreadsheet

Budget Narrative

Science Delivery

Data Management Plan

CV

Support Letters

List of Acronyms

Closes on Nov 17, 2016

Apply Now

17-1-06 Factors that affect the co-management of wildland fire risk More Information Actions
Objective - The objective of this task statement is to advance our fundamental and applied understanding of the human dimensions that affect the co-management(1) of wildland fire risk. Risk in this context may involve uncertainties and differences in stakeholder(2) values that preclude a strictly probabilistic approach to risk management in its traditional sense. Research Needs - Specific research needs include: 1. Assess the social factors that lead to successful or unsuccessful co-management of wildland fire risk across administrative and ownership boundaries and whether they differ by ecosystem, region, or culture. 2. Evaluate how stakeholder views (whether within or across organizations) on accountability for wildland fire, response option implementation affect potential outcomes, in which the perception of accountability can span the spectrum from a legally mandated jurisdictional role to a willingness to engage in cooperative approaches among stakeholders. 3. Determine the role of different models of co-production of knowledge in facilitating stakeholder consensus on the underlying science, values, and accountability for response option implementation that shape risk management decisions. 4. Characterize the uncertainties involved and identify the decision frameworks that can best address them. -- For proposals to be considered responsive to this task statement, proposals must address two or more of the above research needs. Case study approaches are encouraged, but other approaches will be considered if appropriately justified. _________________ (1) Wildland fire frequently impacts landscapes that cross ownership and management boundaries. Co-management occurs between government entities with jurisdictional responsibility for fire incident management and response and other stakeholders who may not have jurisdictional responsibility, but do have management interests impacted by the fire incident. For the purpose of this task statement, co-management refers to the interactions and decisions of these management interests. (2) For the purposes of this task statement, stakeholder includes government entities and private entities whose risk management decisions in regards to fire may impact a broader landscape beyond their own individual interests.

View complete description >>
View FON

Proposal Body

Literature Cited

Budget Spreadsheet

Budget Narrative

Science Delivery

Data Management Plan

CV

Support Letters

List of Acronyms

Closes on Nov 17, 2016

Apply Now

17-2-01 Graduate Research Innovation (GRIN) Award More Information Actions
In partnership with the Association for Fire Ecology, the Joint Fire Science Program (JFSP) invites current master and doctoral students enrolled in US colleges or universities in the fields of wildland fire and related human dimensions, ecological, and atmospheric sciences to apply for a Graduate Research Innovation (GRIN) award. The purpose of a GRIN award is to enhance student exposure to the management and policy relevance of their research to achieve beneficial outcomes of funded work. The JFSP also is interested in understanding the science needs of decision-makers, which provides an opportunity for students to enhance their understanding of how science can be used to inform fire-related policy. As a result, these awards are intended to enable graduate students to conduct research that will supplement and enhance the quality, scope, or applicability of their thesis or dissertation to develop information and products useful to managers and decision-makers. Proposals must demonstrate relevance to fire, fuels, or resource management and include means to directly communicate with managers, when applicable, regarding project outcomes. Proposals must be directly related to the mission and goals of JFSP to be considered. Applicants are encouraged to search the JFSP website (www.firescience.gov) to learn more about the scope of JFSP activities. -- In addition, proposals must directly address management or policy related questions related to one or more of the following topic areas: " Fire behavior " Fire effects " Fuels treatments effectiveness " Post-fire recovery " Social issues and fire -- Proposals on other topics will not be reviewed.

View complete description >>
View FON

Proposal Body

Literature Cited

Budget Spreadsheet

Budget Narrative

Data Management Plan

Advisor Letter

CV

Support Letters

List of Acronyms

Closes on Nov 17, 2016

Apply Now

01-1-1 More Information Actions
Evaluate impacts of alternative management strategies on fire regimes, and/or on the costs or operational impacts associated with fire management in unroaded areas, wilderness areas, and other areas managed for similar purposes. Studies considering ecological, social, and institutional factors are encouraged. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-1-2 More Information Actions
Evaluate factors affecting the feasibility of economically viable utilization of biomass material removed to reduce fire hazard and fuel loading. Proposals should consider economic and social factors (such as fluctuations in wood products markets in areas having fuel treatments) as well as impacts of treatment alternatives on key variables such as fuel loading, carbon storage, soil compaction, water quality, or habitat structure. This task is not intended to solicit proposals for development of new technologies or products for utilization of biomass materials. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-1-3 More Information Actions
Within the matrix of land management practices, determine the cumulative effects of fuels manipulation/reduction methods and techniques on future landscape characteristics in terms of fire behavior and severity, wildlife population and habitat structure dynamics, hydrologic effects, soil processes, ecosystem health issues, and other environmental variables; develop one or more methods or approaches to integrate fuels management into landscape level processes. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-1-4 More Information Actions
Develop, apply, and validate improved aircraft or satellite-based remote sensing applications for quantifying fuel types, fuel condition and loading, fire hazard, fire behavior, and effects such as fire distribution and severity. Approaches must be validated by, and linked to, ground measurements. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-1-5 More Information Actions
Evaluate potential contributions of wildland fire (including prescribed fire) smoke emissions to regional haze; develop and test methods, models, and analysis tools to help managers predict, quantify, identify, and document regional haze caused by wildland fires. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-1-6 More Information Actions
Develop methods or systems for incorporating existing weather and climate predictions (ranging from short- to long-term) into tactical and strategic fire preparedness and planning, prescribed fire planning, mid- and long-range fire and land management planning, and assessments of the potential for success of post fire stabilization and rehabilitation treatments; evaluate and analyze the role of climate in interannual, decadal, or longer term changes in fire season characteristics. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-1-7 More Information Actions
Develop scientifically based support tools to improve fire management decision processes. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-3-1 More Information Actions
Develop demonstration sites in various ecosystems across the United States that can serve to illustrate various fuels treatment practices or techniques, their cost effectiveness, and/or environmental effects. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-3-2 More Information Actions
Develop and implement administrative studies to determine local biological, social, physical, or other effects of wildland fire, fuel treatments, or post-fire stabilization/rehabilitation actions. Administrative studies (sometimes called management studies) are typically limited in terms of the number and complexity of measurement variables and the focus is usually on response rather than process. However, proposed work must be of high quality, defendable, replicated, and subject to peer review. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-3-3 More Information Actions
Address local knowledge gaps that are significant to fire management plan development and implementation. Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-S More Information Actions
Special Projects for 2001 Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01-U More Information Actions
Special Workshop Closed on Apr 23, 2001

01B-2-1 More Information Actions
Obtain, document, and evaluate critical, time-sensitive information or data during or following wildland fire incidents or post fire land treatments. Proposals should focus on fire behavior, immediate post-fire effects including fuels reduction, post fire stabilization or rehabilitation, the effects of previous land management activities on fire behavior and severity, as well as similar issues. Proposals should also address wildland/urban interface areas and issues as appropriate. Organized response teams are required. Closed on Oct 15, 2001

01B-3-1 More Information Actions
Develop demonstration sites in various ecosystems across the United States that can serve to illustrate various fuels treatment practices or techniques, their cost effectiveness, and/or environmental effects. Closed on Oct 15, 2001

01B-3-2 More Information Actions
Develop and implement administrative studies to determine local biological, social, physical, or other effects of wildland fire, fuel treatments, or post-fire stabilization/rehabilitation actions. Administrative studies (sometimes called management studies) are typically limited in terms of the number and complexity of measurement variables and the focus is usually on response rather than process. However, proposed work must be of high quality, defendable, replicated, and subject to peer review. Closed on Oct 15, 2001

01B-3-3 More Information Actions
Address local knowledge gaps that are significant to fire management plan development and implementation. Closed on Oct 15, 2001

01C-2-1 More Information Actions
Obtain, document, and evaluate critical, time-sensitive information or data during or following wildland fire incidents or post fire land treatments. Proposals should focus on fire behavior, immediate post-fire effects including fuels reduction, post fire stabilization or rehabilitation, the effects of previous land management activities on fire behavior and severity, as well as similar issues. Proposals should also address wildland/urban interface areas and issues as appropriate. Organized response teams are required. Closed on Apr 19, 2002

01C-3-1 More Information Actions
Develop demonstration sites in various ecosystems across the United States that can serve to illustrate various fuels treatment practices or techniques, their cost effectiveness, and/or environmental effects. Closed on Apr 19, 2002

01C-3-3 More Information Actions
Address local knowledge gaps that are significant to fire management plan development and implementation. Closed on Apr 19, 2002